Consumercidal Happenings

Tuesday, July 7, 2009 9:54 AM
By: Dr. Russell Blaylock

An outbreak of swine flu occurred in Mexico this spring that eventually affected 4,910 Mexican citizens and resulted in 85 deaths. By the time it spread to the United States, the virus caused only mild cases of flu-like illness.

Thanks to air travel and the failure of public health officials to control travel from Mexico, the virus spread worldwide. Despite predictions of massive numbers of deaths and the arrival of doomsday, the virus has remained a relatively mild disease, something we know happens each year with flu epidemics.

Worldwide, there have only been 311 deaths out of 70,893 cases of swine flu. In the United States, 27,717 cases have resulted in 127 deaths. Every death is a tragedy, but such a low death rate should not be the basis of a draconian government policy.

It is helpful to recall that the Centers for Disease Control with the collusion of the media, constantly tell us that 36,000 people die from the flu each year, a figure that has been shown to be a lie. In this case, we are talking about 300 plus deaths for the entire world.

This virus continues to be an enigma for virologists. In the April 30, 2009 issue of Nature, a virologist was quoted as saying,“Where the hell it got all these genes from we don’t know.” Extensive analysis of the virus found that it contained the original 1918 H1N1 flu virus, the avian flu virus (bird flu), and two new H3N2 virus genes from Eurasia. Debate continues over the possibility that swine flu is a genetically engineered virus.

Naturally, vaccine manufacturers have been in a competitive battle to produce the first vaccine. The main contenders have been Baxter Pharmaceuticals and Novartis Pharmaceuticals, the latter of which recently acquired the scandal-ridden Chiron vaccine company. Both of these companies have had agreements with the World Health Organization to produce a pandemic vaccine.

The Baxter vaccine, called Celvapan, has had fast track approval. It uses a new vero cell technology, which utilizes cultured cells from the African green monkey. This same animal tissue transmits a number of vaccine-contaminating viruses, including the HIV virus.

The Baxter company has been associated with two deadly scandals. The first event occurred in 2006 when hemophiliac components were contaminated with HIV virus and injected in tens of thousands of people, including thousands of children. Baxter continued to release the HIV contaminated vaccine even after the contamination was known.

The second event occurred recently when it was discovered that Baxter had released a seasonal flu vaccine containing the bird flu virus, which would have produced a real world pandemic, to 18 countries. Fortunately, astute lab workers in the Czech Republic discovered the deadly combination and blew the whistle before a worldwide disaster was unleashed.

Despite these two deadly events, WHO maintains an agreement with Baxter Pharmaceuticals to produce the world’s pandemic vaccine.

Novartis, the second contender, also has an agreement with WHO for a pandemic vaccine. Novartis appears to have won the contract, since their vaccine is near completion. What is terrifying is that these pandemic vaccines contain ingredients, called immune adjuvants that a number of studies have shown cause devastating autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and lupus.

Animal studies using this adjuvant have found them to be deadly. A study using 14 guinea pigs found that when they were injected with the special adjuvant, only one animal survived. A repeat of the study found the same deadly outcome.

So, what is this deadly ingredient? It is called squalene, a type of oil. The Chiron company, maker of the deadly anthrax vaccine, makes an adjuvant called MF-59 which contains two main ingredients of concern—squalene and gp120. A number of studies have shown that squalene can trigger all of the above-mentioned autoimmune diseases when injected.

The MF-59 adjuvant has been used in several vaccines. These vaccines, including tetanus and diphtheria, are the same vaccines frequently associated with adverse reactions.

I reviewed a number of studies on this adjuvant and found something quite interesting. Several studies done on human test subjects found MF-59 to be a very safe immune adjuvant. But when I checked to see who did these studies, I found—to no surprise—that they were done by the Novartis Pharmaceutical Company and Chiron Pharmaceutical Company, which have merged. They were all published in “prestigious” medical journals. Also, to no surprise, a great number of studies done by independent laboratories and research institutions all found a strong link between MF-59 and autoimmune diseases.

Squalene in vaccines has been strongly linked to the Gulf War Syndrome. On August 1991, Anthony Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs admitted that soldiers vaccinated with the anthrax vaccine from 1990 to 1991 had an increased risk of 200 percent in developing the deadly disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also called Lou Gehrig’s disease. The soldiers also suffered from a number of debilitating and life-shortening diseases, such as polyarteritis nodosa, multiple sclerosis (MS), lupus, transverse myelitis (a neurological disorder caused by inflammation of the spinal cord), endocarditis (inflammation of the heart’s inner lining), optic neuritis with blindness and glomerulonephritis (a type of kidney disease).

Because squalene, the main ingredient in MF-59, can induce hyperimmune responses and induce autoimmunity, a real danger exists for prolonged activation of the brain’s immune cells, the microglia. This type of prolonged activation has been strongly associated with such diseases as multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, ALS and possibly vaccine-related encephalitis. It has been shown that activation of the systemic immune system, as occurs with vaccination, rapidly activates the brain’s microglia at the same time, and this brain inflammation can persist for long periods.

So, how would the gp120 get into the brain? Studies of other immune adjuvants using careful tracer techniques have shown that they routinely enter the brain following vaccination. What most people do not know, even the doctors who recommend the vaccines, is that most such studies by pharmaceutical companies observe the patients for only one to two weeks following vaccination—these types of reactions may take months or even years to manifest.

It is obvious that the vaccine manufacturers stand to make billions of dollars in profits from this WHO/government-promoted pandemic. Novartis, the maker of the new pandemic vaccine, recently announced that they would not give free vaccines to impoverished nations—everybody pays.

One must keep in mind that once the vaccine is injected, there is little you can do to protect yourself—at least by conventional medicine. It will mean a lifetime of crippling illness and early death.

There are much safer ways to protect oneself from this flu virus, such as higher doses of vitamin D3, selective immune enhancement using supplements, and a good diet.

© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

** I had sent the following message and have not received a reply. It seems that the paper that Kary Mullis, inventor and Nobel Prize winner for PCR, had also asked for and never got is still missing. – George

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: George DeCarlo geodecarlo@yahoo.com
To: jbaum@ghstrat.com; vzonana@ghstrat.com; Enterprise@vaccineenterprise.org
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 12:51:36 PM
Subject: HIV scientific paper citation

Dear Dr. Alan Bernstein and Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise,

The following article makes mention of "the publication of the scientific paper announcing the discovery of the virus." Would I be able to have you send me the paper citation.

Thank you,

George DeCarlo

~~~~~~~~~~~~

February 14th 2008: Scientists who support the HIV=AIDS theory might have seized the opportunity for an "aha" moment, or at least a faint increment in self-realisation, as AAAS President David Baltimore addressed the attendees of the annual meeting in Boston. But alas, vested interests and professional ego-identities are at stake, and so the cerebral clouds remain...

AAAS President announces:

"Scientists are no further forward in developing a vaccine against HIV after more than 20 years of research." and "An Aids vaccine might never be found."

When HIV was linked to Aids in the early 1980s scientists were convinced a vaccine would be around the corner. Baltimore said: "We've been working on that vaccine since then and we are no closer to a vaccine now than we were then."
(-from Guardian article after the BBC one, below)

Implicit in the above statement is the fact that these same scientists, who were so thoroughly convinced of the ability to produce a vaccine, were also thoroughly convinced about the reality of the HIV=AIDS Hypothesis in the first place.

Amusingly, Baltimore spent some time attacking the Bush administration and its record on supporting "the free reign of science":

"There has been an attempt to suppress government scientists from speaking out, there has been control of what scientists can go to scientific meetings and give talks - something totally unknown to us in previous years. That kind of attempt to control scientific information will, I hope, end with the Bush administration."
(-also from Guardian article below)

Baltimore and other scientists (as well as media covering the address) unanimously failed to see the irony of the above statements, given that the scientific community was guilty of exactly the same activities of suppression of dissident scientists such as Duesberg, Root-Bernstein, Nobelist Kary Mullis, and the (more than) dozens of other high profile scientists and medical professionals that took issue with the very core presumption that HIV caused AIDS, ever since the dubious pronouncement was foisted upon the world in 1984.

Rather than release the obstinate grip on their tattered and failing paradigm, the scientific community seems more resolute than ever, citing ever increasingly convincing little 3D pictures being developed in photoshop, lightwave, etc. Like the one accompanying the BBC article immediately below.

Baltimore's statements approximate the scientific equivalent of the US administration's eventual admission that "we have not found weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq. The fact that such people, in either politics or science, are driving such errors, is highly regrettable for mankind.

____________________________________
HIV vaccine research hits impasse
By Helen Briggs
Science reporter, BBC News, Boston
____________________________________

"HIV has evolved to protect itself from the human immune system"

HIV binds to the surface of the human immune (CD4) cell (PRNewswire dated 19/11/07)

Scientists are no further forward in developing a vaccine against HIV after more than 20 years of research, a Nobel Prize-winning biologist has said.

Professor David Baltimore, president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), said there was little hope among scientists.

But he said that they were continuing efforts to develop a vaccine.

"Our lack of success may be understandable but it is not acceptable," he said.

=> Read more!

The HIV=AIDS myth takes its toll in many ways; here's another.
Consult main consumercide website HIV section for more.

(Excerpt from "AIDS myth exposed" mail group)

From: natpal0

Hello,

I'm new to this forum a straight female who has never been tested because I always feared what the results would be due to a relationship I had 16 years ago (someone from a high risk group). After that I went on to have a long term relationship and we broke up.
Since reading the literature it doesn't seem the tests have and value anyway.
I'm healthy and have never been ill except for common colds.
However here is how it has effected me-in the straight population there are two types those who get tested all the time and those who never bother (in general) I haven't had a relationship in 10 years due to these fears -are there other straight people like me out there??????

ps-I'm not homophobic IN ANY WAY

Message 5 in Discussion
From: HIVbollyx

Natpal it's a terrible shame that you haven't been able to have a relationship for 10 years. I thought I was high risk in the past as a health care worker who as a clumsy git managed to sustain about 12 needlestick injuries. I got an HIV test 12 years ago when I met my current partner when I still believed HIV = AIDS. I think now how my life would have been rather different if I had tested "positive" then when I didn't know what I do now. Other than the run of the mill STDs you have absolutely nothing to worry about - go forth and you know what.

Click on title for a blog with a series of good dissident discussions on the Parenzee case.

By Michael Geiger

The May 5th piece by Ruth Pollard, the Sydney Morning Herald Health reporter, titled “Shadow of Doubters” about HIV deniers, as she calls them, seems to be more propaganda directed by those making their livings and fortunes from the belief in HIV and AIDS, including Pollard, as she herself has even prospered from her many articles on the subject. Her view seems especially tainted by those she quotes who are well funded by both drug companies and government spending, and are peddling the proven deadly toxic AIDS drugs that cater to the inner death wishes and panicked terror of some emotionally pained homosexuals as well as the death wishes of some of the destitute and starving poverty stricken masses of 3rd world countries. These people are well paid to believe in it and are quite liable if the flaws in HIV science are found out by the public.

=> Read more!

Dr. Henry Bauer
May, 2007
hhbauer@vt.edu
The opportunity to question HIV = AIDS dogma in a court of law came about via an Adelaide, Australia news story:

=> Read more!

Click Title Link for Relevant External Page

"The trial of Andre Parenzee seemed, at first glance, depressingly familiar. Another person who is HIV-positive being convicted and sentenced to years in jail for having consensual sex with HIV-negative people. But, this trial was different, it was turned into a trial of the very existence of HIV, due to the expert testimony of Perth Group members Val Turner and Eleni Eleopulos. So dangerous was this that the machine of HIV=AID$=Death rolled into motion providing a news blackout outside Australia and, when things did not appear to be going so well, the testimony of HIV inventor Robert Gallo via video hookup and a call for help from one of the prosecution 'experts' to 'Denialist' and Nobelist Kary Mullis.

Thanks to Claus Jensen, Etienne de Harven, Michael Geiger and Croft Woodruff for their contributions to the analysis of these transcripts."

A nice collection of challenges to mainstream HIV=AIDS thinking that capably elucidate the significant problems encountered with any defence of that paradigm, and the amount of skewing of thought that must be undertaken in order to defend it. Many cogent arguments by rethinkers (particularly David Crowe) are included in these dialogues.

http://www.rethinkingaids.com/Challenges/

also see the Consumercide HIV-AIDS Politics section.

Twenty years later
Celia Farber looks back on two decades of AIDS reportage

One of the most tragic stories of the AIDS crisis is the excoriation of those – journalists, researchers, patients – whose voices are silenced by a 20-year orthodoxy of media hype, drug money and scientific stardom. Journalist Celia Farber, deemed controversial and an HIV denialist by many, has spent two decades reporting the dark, greedy history of AIDS, played out by drug companies, the government and people on the street.

=> Read more!

Expert witness says HIV 'doesn't exist'

By Todd Cardy

December 19, 2006 06:35pm
Article from: AAP

A PERTH medical researcher has told an Adelaide court that Africa does not have an AIDS crisis because HIV does not exist.
Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos today told the South Australian Court of Criminal Appeal that no one had proven that HIV exists.

=> Read more!